3 ms·
Once you accept that imaginary number is not about a straight real number but a number about rotation. And you have two number that is not the same. One about
by ngcc_hk 3y ago
Once you accept that imaginary number is not about a straight real number but a number about rotation. And you have two number that is not the same. One about straight line and one about rotation I.e.
X0 ops X1(another number system ) where X0, X1 is real
You can have complex number or a+ bi where i^2 = -1
And you can have split complex number a+bj where j^2 = 1 etc
The next move may be then not to q but to try
x0 ops x1n1 ops x2n2 ops … xi is all real but ni is a different number system represent things not on the real number. Of course you can do q here. But ..
The natural course is to cliff geometry, where it dimension meant something else.
Or even more other systems.
- NotGMan 3y agoGeometric algebra is the only intuitive explanations of quaternions that I have seen, since geometric algebra actually explains what quaternions are much better. You can then see that rotations using rotors (from geometric algebra aka "quaternions") are then basicaly two consequitive mirror operations across two vectors.