23 ms·
Eh, unless there's current ligation forcing record retention, just having a really short retention period is an easy enough solution.
by MrOwen 3y ago
Eh, unless there's current ligation forcing record retention, just having a really short retention period is an easy enough solution.
- cyrux004 3y agoDidnt Sundar ask disappearing messages to be turned on on an internal communcation tool ?
- MrOwen 3y agoI believe so but from what I recall, he still wanted syncing between phone/computer which required the messages be stored at some point, alebeit with an extremely small ttl (minutes? seconds?). This miniscule retention meant the record was created despite a low ttl and so when the record was removed, it became a violation of the court-ordered record retention. Again, this is all just from fuzzy memory but I think that's how it approximately went down.
- Rebelgecko 3y agoYou might be interested in https:// https:// www. jwz.org /gruntle/ rbarip.html (I'm obfuscating the URL a bit because the website's owner does something rude if your browser sends an HN referer header)
- fragmede 3y agohttps://www.jwz.org/gruntle/rbarip.html https://www.jwz.org/gruntle/rbarip.html HN turned off referrer globally, so that no longer happens.
- kirubakaran 3y agoHN uses rel="noreferrer" on all links so perhaps this is no longer an issue? Let's see: https://www.jwz.org/gruntle/rbarip.html https://www.jwz.org/gruntle/rbarip.html
- fshbbdssbbgdd 3y agoI’m pretty sure everywhere I’ve ever worked has notified me that there is a legal hold on deleting my communications. And I’m just a simple programmer.