6 ms·
For family and friends fine. When you have 30,000 users worldwide is it daunting.
by BrandoElFollito 3y ago
For family and friends fine.
When you have 30,000 users worldwide is it daunting.
- johannes84 3y agoI agree! Therefore I’d suggest more people should host for family and friends :-)
- imoverclocked 3y agoExcept, family and friends isn't the target here. It's large-ish, professional organizations with a lot more surface area and visibility than your family email server. I've run this kind of friends/family setup, but I've also run a small org setup with a lot more visibility. It's definitely two different beasts... and that was a decade ago.
- BrandoElFollito 3y agoIt depends what. I self host a lot of services for family and friends - but ony the ones I have complete control over. If there is a problem with something, I want to have a hope of fixing it (either someone already had the issue, or I can open an issue, or I can try try to fix the code/configuration myself). These are great. Mail not so much. This can become a continuous struggle to get off blacklists, manage spam, troubleshoot deliveries, ... All these are not dependent on me and if I get into a blacklist or if Google stops to accept my mail I am cooked. This is the reason that after self-hosting email for a few years I got back to having it done by people whose job it is .