4 ms·
To be fair, that's because he leveled the playing field that was tilted in favor of the elite establishment consensus. They aren't supportive of a platform with
by gorwell 3y ago
To be fair, that's because he leveled the playing field that was tilted in favor of the elite establishment consensus. They aren't supportive of a platform with free speech. ie, speech one disagrees with. Team Establishment was happy when it censored opposing viewpoints and it's no surprise, although unfortunate, they migrated to regressive platforms where that still occurs.
- Ensorceled 3y ago> To be fair, that's because he leveled the playing field that was tilted in favor of the elite establishment consensus. Do you really believe this? Anyway, most of the people I follow left because of the terrible people and bots, sooooo many bots, clogging up their timeline with right wing nonsense.
- smsm42 3y agoWhy not believe it if it's true? Twitter was systematically working with the government to ban people they (and sometimes by weird comedy of errors, also Russian FSB) want to ban. They were also systematically banning and suppressing people expressing opinions disfavored by the elite consensus. Bots don't help of course, but the presence of bots doesn't preclude the tilted playing field.
- Ensorceled 3y ago> Why not believe it if it's true? Twitter was systematically working with the government to ban people they (and sometimes by weird comedy of errors, also Russian FSB) want to ban. That’s still happening. But what does that have to do “elite consensus”?
- smsm42 3y agoWho is banned and who is not is determined by that consensus.