5 ms·
I suspect myriad. Academic politics is messier than real-world politics. In the Dark Triad personality classification, Machiavellianism should be a job requirem
by waterheater 3y ago
I suspect myriad. Academic politics is messier than real-world politics. In the Dark Triad personality classification, Machiavellianism should be a job requirement for professors if they are to succeed in such a twisted climate (and, as it turns out, many meet that requirement). Bear in mind that academics are better at generalized problem solving than most people, so their attempts to find viable solutions to complex political problems tend to be either elaborate or manipulative.
Good people do exist in academia, but most of them have retired, and the rest put up with it. I have a general belief that, unlike the majority of careers, being a successful academic (and I can't underscore "academic" enough) requires a strong moral compass, historically oriented toward a "Divine Light of Truth" or God, which ever floats your boat. Such is not required in a grant-seeking paradigm.
- AlbertCory 3y agoI was at a talk at 3Com by an MIT professor that Metcalfe knew. He made the old joke that "academic politics are so vicious because nothing's at stake." The prof said, "that depends on whether you consider reputation 'nothing'. " So there you have your reason: anyone whose livelihood depends solely on the good opinion of others is likely to have low moral standards.
- waterheater 3y ago>anyone whose livelihood depends solely on the good opinion of others is likely to have low moral standards Highly insightful.
- AlbertCory 3y agocribbed from Skin in the Game (Taleb)