4 ms·
Kagi lets you exclude websites entirely, so… yes with an asterisk that you have to put some legwork in to fully do so.
by SllX 3y ago
Kagi lets you exclude websites entirely, so… yes with an asterisk that you have to put some legwork in to fully do so.
- djbusby 3y agoWould be cool if Kagi had a way to share, or to locate others lists.
- pimlottc 3y agoI assume you mean excluding individual websites; though the idea of a search engine ignoring all websites is pretty amusing... (maybe you still get hits from Usenet posts?)
- SllX 3y agoYeah, that’s the legwork you have to do. Honestly it’s probably not much legwork but if filters like this were more prevalent in say Google for example, it would turn into a cat and mouse game very quickly between search engine users and blogspam.
- mysterydip 3y agoYeah, I feel like the reason Kagi works is because google still delivers the majority of results to these sites. If Kagi one day becomes dominant, the filters will cease to work as you said.
- spookie 3y agoIt's more... about the user having that control, not the service provider. I would wager it would still work all the same. Perhaps, some websites would stop being so hostile if they were considered as such and blocked by a higher percentage of users :)
- dvngnt_ 3y agoyou mean you don't like Pinterest search results?
- rchaud 3y agoKagi needs to be able to exclude sites with Amazon affiliate links. That's the only reason people create those awful "Best X of 2023" sites.