3 ms·
Yeah. It's very unlikely to get something these days. The last person I can think of that got a hereditary title (not necessary the last person to get one, just
by gadders 3y ago
Yeah. It's very unlikely to get something these days. The last person I can think of that got a hereditary title (not necessary the last person to get one, just one that I remember) is Dennis Thatcher getting a baronetcy.
And wikipedia tells me: "It is the only baronetcy to have been granted since 1964, and is one of only three extant hereditary titles awarded outside the British royal family since 1965."
Anyway, I'll keep up my gym going etc just in case I am inside an orphanage when it comes under attack.
I'm not sure though whether the fact that new hereditary titles not being created is more or less egalitarian? It now means unless your family did something 800 years ago you're out of luck.
- balderdash 3y agoSomething of a nit, but I thing Baronets are a bit of hybrid in that they are not peers, but it’s a hereditary title
- gadders 3y agoAgreed, not a peerage but I'd take it.
- tialaramex 3y agoBecause most of the peerages automatically extinguish in certain situations (e.g. no male heir, no heir at all, or sometimes if their holder is King / Queen), they will gradually die out over a long period. This is also a sign that they're not a modern (or even modernised) institution.