4 ms·

Because I had the question and I figured this was quicker. I didn’t know what dependent types were. So now you know why I do it. Also, I believe this is my fir

Because I had the question and I figured this was quicker. I didn’t know what dependent types were. So now you know why I do it. Also, I believe this is my first time doing it. I might be wrong. Is it better to ask and wait for an answer instead? There is nothing in the guidelines on HN about it. I don’t know what’s reasonable and I haven’t seen strong cultural norms from HN yet. I at least labeled that the text was from chatgpt as to not confuse it was my own text.

kccqzy 3y ago
Did you forget about search engines that enable you to do your own research rather than asking a human or an LLM?
- mettamage 3y ago
  I could use google but chatgpt wins on speed and asking on HN wins on vine. When someone asks me a question I am mostly quite enthusiastic in explaining it. You can’t get that as easily from a search engine. It all has trade offs.
  - kccqzy 3y ago
    I don't fault you if you explicitly emphasize speed rather than accuracy. Just don't post these on HN.
howenterprisey 3y ago
It's of course fine to ask chatgpt. I also appreciate that you wrote that it was from chatgpt. However, I wouldn't recommend posting the result here if you don't know if it's correct. Moreover, anyone can ask chatgpt themselves. It's better to wait for someone here to post an answer. Yes, there's nothing in the guidelines, but they're (deliberately) not all-encompassing. Besides, I would hope it's part of basic Internet etiquette; just because we now have access to tools that generate plausible-sounding but not necessarily correct answers to questions doesn't mean we need to post what they create in the place of genuine answers.
- mettamage 3y ago
  > Besides, I would hope it's part of basic Internet etiquette Yea that got lost on me. I think I view these things a bit differently than most on HN. I've noticed in general that the more I'm not at uni, the more my thinking has become heuristic and quick-ish. It used to be more thorough and in-depth. The trade-off of it being that such type of thinking is more time consuming but the answer is more comprehensive and/or accurate.
gosub100 3y ago
> Is it better to ask and wait for an answer instead? No, around here it's better to say "So dependent types are pretty much $SOMETHING_COMPLETLY_WRONG ?" and wait for all the "corrections" (aka Cunningham's law someone linked to nearby).

kccqzy 3y ago

Did you forget about search engines that enable you to do your own research rather than asking a human or an LLM?

mettamage 3y ago
I could use google but chatgpt wins on speed and asking on HN wins on vine. When someone asks me a question I am mostly quite enthusiastic in explaining it. You can’t get that as easily from a search engine. It all has trade offs.
- kccqzy 3y ago
  I don't fault you if you explicitly emphasize speed rather than accuracy. Just don't post these on HN.

howenterprisey 3y ago

It's of course fine to ask chatgpt. I also appreciate that you wrote that it was from chatgpt. However, I wouldn't recommend posting the result here if you don't know if it's correct. Moreover, anyone can ask chatgpt themselves. It's better to wait for someone here to post an answer. Yes, there's nothing in the guidelines, but they're (deliberately) not all-encompassing. Besides, I would hope it's part of basic Internet etiquette; just because we now have access to tools that generate plausible-sounding but not necessarily correct answers to questions doesn't mean we need to post what they create in the place of genuine answers.

mettamage 3y ago
> Besides, I would hope it's part of basic Internet etiquette Yea that got lost on me. I think I view these things a bit differently than most on HN. I've noticed in general that the more I'm not at uni, the more my thinking has become heuristic and quick-ish. It used to be more thorough and in-depth. The trade-off of it being that such type of thinking is more time consuming but the answer is more comprehensive and/or accurate.

gosub100 3y ago

> Is it better to ask and wait for an answer instead? No, around here it's better to say "So dependent types are pretty much $SOMETHING_COMPLETLY_WRONG ?" and wait for all the "corrections" (aka Cunningham's law someone linked to nearby).