3 ms·
That's an interesting point, and one that further suggests that we're better off shifting to more services and less manufacturing for the low-end stuff. Eventu
by showerst 15y ago
That's an interesting point, and one that further suggests that we're better off shifting to more services and less manufacturing for the low-end stuff.
Eventually automation might replace the bottom level of nurses and plumbers, (more so nurses than plumbers), but it will take _much_ longer.
I have some family/friends who are in that 'only high school diploma, no credentials/money/drive to go to a non-community college' trap, and one big barrier is that the training programs for Nursing Aides, Auto Tech, and even office/clerical have 1 year+ wait times. Even though they _want_ to gain these skills, they need to support themselves until they get into the program, and while they're working through it.
Even though there's great demand for the skills, and workers who want to gain them, the training pipeline just hasn't expanded yet.
- ericd 15y agoI've long wondered why we're not investing more in skilled labor/vocational training as a country - any idea what the bottleneck is there? A lack of qualified instructors? Specifically, I think it'd be great if the govt. made training a valid alternative to "looking for a job" as a requirement for continued welfare/unemployment (might already be the case, but I've not heard of that being so).