> I am well aware of what static program analysis, thank you very much. You see, I don't think you are. If you were, you certainly wouldn't make totally obli

> I am well aware of what static program analysis, thank you very much. You see, I don't think you are. If you were, you certainly wouldn't make totally oblivious claims such as "static analyzers are for when your test suite is subpar." > Sounds like finding defects to me. If you were familiar with static analysis tools, you'd be well aware that they only cover a narrow class of defects, which other classes of automated tests do. Again, I seriously recommend you onboard onto the basics of automated testing, specially the intro section on the classes of tests and what are their design goals, and in the meantime refrain from posting comments on testing.