3 ms·
> It doesn’t matter that the average Chinese has fewer cars. They still need cars, which means public transportation can’t eliminate the problem. This sounds l
by selcuka 3y ago
> It doesn’t matter that the average Chinese has fewer cars. They still need cars, which means public transportation can’t eliminate the problem.
This sounds like the Nirvana fallacy [1]. The dilemma is not about eliminating all cars. It is whether we should invest in public transit which would also reduce noise, pollution, energy usage, or in self driving cars, which won't fix any of those.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy
- janalsncm 3y agoSuggesting that we completely replace cars with public transportation is indeed the Nirvana fallacy. It’s not going to happen in any reasonable time frame, nor is it politically viable or practical. Instead, we should focus on making cars safer.