4 ms·

That the situation you describe, in which "those people" (Rumble, X, DCMS), either demonetized or solicited the demonetizing of Russell Brand's content. That di

That the situation you describe, in which "those people" (Rumble, X, DCMS), either demonetized or solicited the demonetizing of Russell Brand's content. That did not happen, as the original link sets out very clearly.

motohagiography 3y ago
For clarity: > Consequently, Dinenage had sought an audience with Linda Yaccarino, X’s CEO, expressing apprehensions regarding the comedian’s ability to monetize his content on the platform amid the accusations. She also queried whether Musk had influenced the decision-making process pertaining to Brand’s case, given the billionaire owner’s public defense of the comedian. In addition to the article linked within the article that details the letter Dame Dinenage sent to other platforms asking whether they would demonetize him, with the implication it was the governments strong preference. Consider whether your comments improve the discourse or undermine it.
- georgespencer 3y ago
  Just lol @ thinking that this statement: > Removing someones ability to defend themselves against serious allegations by cutting them off from their ability to make money to pay for said defense undermines the integrity of the legal system itself. It's a thumb on the scale. These people believe in nothing. Is supported by this citation: > Consequently, Dinenage had sought an audience with Linda Yaccarino, X’s CEO, expressing apprehensions regarding the comedian’s ability to monetize his content on the platform amid the accusations. She also queried whether Musk had influenced the decision-making process pertaining to Brand’s case, given the billionaire owner’s public defense of the comedian. You said: > cutting them off from their ability to make money What happened: > expressing apprehensions Consider whether your comments reflect reality or undermine it ;)

motohagiography 3y ago

For clarity: > Consequently, Dinenage had sought an audience with Linda Yaccarino, X’s CEO, expressing apprehensions regarding the comedian’s ability to monetize his content on the platform amid the accusations. She also queried whether Musk had influenced the decision-making process pertaining to Brand’s case, given the billionaire owner’s public defense of the comedian. In addition to the article linked within the article that details the letter Dame Dinenage sent to other platforms asking whether they would demonetize him, with the implication it was the governments strong preference. Consider whether your comments improve the discourse or undermine it.

georgespencer 3y ago
Just lol @ thinking that this statement: > Removing someones ability to defend themselves against serious allegations by cutting them off from their ability to make money to pay for said defense undermines the integrity of the legal system itself. It's a thumb on the scale. These people believe in nothing. Is supported by this citation: > Consequently, Dinenage had sought an audience with Linda Yaccarino, X’s CEO, expressing apprehensions regarding the comedian’s ability to monetize his content on the platform amid the accusations. She also queried whether Musk had influenced the decision-making process pertaining to Brand’s case, given the billionaire owner’s public defense of the comedian. You said: > cutting them off from their ability to make money What happened: > expressing apprehensions Consider whether your comments reflect reality or undermine it ;)