4 ms·
Your point is well-taken, but there is: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ennigaldi-Nanna%27s_museum https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ennigaldi-Nanna%27s_museum
by eszed 3y ago
Your point is well-taken, but there is:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ennigaldi-Nanna%27s_museum https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ennigaldi-Nanna%27s_museum
It's one of my favorite archeological finds ever.
I suspect that there have been people in every age who valued, preserved, and studied material remains of the past. At a broad social and cultural level, however, you are correct.
- jaza 3y agoThanks for that - never heard of Ennigaldi-Nanna's museum before. Amazing to think that ~2,500 years ago, they had artifacts on exhibit that were already ~1,500 years old at that time. And labels in three different languages - all they were missing was the audio guide!
- timeon 3y agoIt is not that strange - they were no cavemen. This was in Pythagoras days.