3 ms·
That's actually somewhat accurate, shoot someone with a single 9mm and there's a good chance they'll keep coming like they only stepped on a lego. Depends on i
by lamontcg 3y ago
That's actually somewhat accurate, shoot someone with a single 9mm and there's a good chance they'll keep coming like they only stepped on a lego. Depends on if you hit something vital or not, but a whole lot of the human body isn't that immediately vital.
But really this is why guns are only for killing people and why you'd empty the magazine if you do it. You can't rely on crippling someone by shooting their leg like in a video game (or sometimes in the movies).
- gosub100 3y ago> there's a good chance I don't see "good chance" on my scientific calculator, or wolfram alpha, or any of my math textbooks. Care to enlighten me on its definition? I have seen hundreds of videos (in the seedy corners of the net) of people being shot, and I can't recall a single one where the victim kept approaching after being fired upon.
- lamontcg 3y agoHere's one: https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2021/02/08/2448815/maryland-deputy-sheriff-opens-fire-at-stick-swinging-assailant-s-chest-video https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2021/02/08/2448815/maryla...
- gosub100 3y agoso "good chance" == 1? That's a meaningless argument. If the value = 1, then we're talking about a value less than the number of people who have been hit by falling space rocks. People don't change the way they act based on 1 incident.
- lamontcg 3y agoYou said you hadn't seen one and I quickly found you one. No, I don't know how to quantify it, but if you'd like to continue to disagree with me I think you'll have to do the research on it, since you seem to be very engaged with the problem, and I have other things to do.