4 ms·
I think they would first want to know if there were any natives worth enslaving there. I kid. I agree we should go there. But not because of Columbus specifica
by mcv 3y ago
I think they would first want to know if there were any natives worth enslaving there.
I kid. I agree we should go there. But not because of Columbus specifically.
- Jeff_Brown 3y agoIt's actually an interesting comparison. If the Queen of Spain circa 1500 had today's technology she wouldn't care nearly as much about Mars as she did then about India (sic) because extracting anything from Mars can't possibly be profitable yet. She wasn't in it for the science; she was in it for god, glory and gold, and not necessarily in that order.
- jimnotgym 3y agoOn the other hand both Spanish capital and Columbus personally took a huge risk. They knew less about what lay ahead than we know about Mars. They new the rewards were high, but the risks were enormous.
- Jeff_Brown 3y agoColombus and his band of scoundrels certainly took a huge risk. He was hell-bent on joining the aristocracy, and it seems to have made him willing to believe and argue things that a less motivated person might not have done. Google says his whole expedition cost about 1.5 million maravedis. I'm not finding what fraction of the Spanish crown's budget that was. Do you know?
- gosub100 3y agoAnd in 600 years, modern society might consider _us_ slaves for having to work under duress for the wealthy elite.