5 ms·
No, you see the diplomatic relationships are "in transition" [1] and based on 150-year-old treaties, this is totally legit. /s [1] https://www.joseon.com/l/en-
by V__ 3y ago
No, you see the diplomatic relationships are "in transition" [1] and based on 150-year-old treaties, this is totally legit. /s
[1] https://www.joseon.com/l/en-US/government/foreign-relations https://www.joseon.com/l/en-US/government/foreign-relations
- eddtries 3y agoThat treaty ran out in 1910, so even if somehow this successor state was a thing the treaty itself is void I think https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseon–United_States_Treaty_of_1882 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseon–United_States_Treaty_of...
- soco 3y agoTreaties between sides of that time, which are not necessarily the ones today only because someone says "we are the successor". So before talking treaties, let's talk legitimacy.