4 ms·
Fair enough; if I were to change the qualifiers associated with the project, what’s cool about what exists here and how would you describe it in a way that’s ma
by keithwhor 3y ago
Fair enough; if I were to change the qualifiers associated with the project, what’s cool about what exists here and how would you describe it in a way that’s maximally appealing? Is “type-safe” an acceptable generalization given an audience less sophisticated than you or can I use a different framing to the same effect?
- stagas 3y agoFor this software to be appealing it would need to really be type-safe, meaning you'd need to use TypeScript. Type-safe means I can change an interface in project B and project A that depends on B now shows me errors in the editor exactly where I need to visit to fix it. If that isn't happening, it can't be called type-safe or generalized to that term. Currently it's a type-unsafe HTTP endpoint runtime type validator.
- keithwhor 3y agoThat’s good feedback! We can probably do both; if you think it’s cool would you be interested in contributing to TypeScript support to circle the square?