4 ms·
Sure — we see that behavior routinely destroy companies who engage in it, while the opposite causes corporate growth. This creates a constant flux of new compa
by zmgsabst 3y ago
Sure — we see that behavior routinely destroy companies who engage in it, while the opposite causes corporate growth.
This creates a constant flux of new companies engaging in healthy partnership with their employees and old companies cycling back to rekindle growth — and which removes the ones who engage in that problematic behavior, persistently.
So that behavior always brings about its own cessation.
See my point about “Day 2”.
Engaging in Day 2 policy is a choice; working with Day 2 companies is a choice.
There’s nothing at all which requires this phenomenon, other than people make lame excuses as if dark triad behavior is some unavoidable law of physics.
- lazide 3y agoSure - except plenty of companies and gov’ts are steady state this way and don’t end up destroyed by it. At least any faster than any other companies/gov’ts seem to be. You’re ’just world’ hypothesis’ing all over the place here. I’m not saying it’s good behavior. It’s far more widespread than you’re giving it credit for, and it has far less connection to bad results than you are giving it credit for. Often, the ‘good’ companies just paper over it better, but it’s still the same policy - but fewer folks end up seeing it so directly.