3 ms·
> Sorry! I shouldn't have hurt your religion at the first place. In place of spewing this nonsensical shit, you could have quoted me an example of "exponential
by irahul 15y ago
> Sorry! I shouldn't have hurt your religion at the first place.
In place of spewing this nonsensical shit, you could have quoted me an example of "exponential gains".
Out of curiosity, have you actually programmed in Lisp or Haskell? I am not saying you have, I am not saying you haven't; it's just that people who claim "fuck yeah macros - now I am 100x more productive" are mostly people who haven't actually used them and are regurgitating blogosphere bullshit.
- kamaal 15y agoWell I should have learned long back to not argue with impolite people. This is one lesson I'm not going to forget.
- irahul 15y ago> Well I should have learned long back to not argue with impolite people. Sheesh. In this thread, there is nothing but platitude in your posts, and you are constantly trying to put down people(everyone else who doesn't agree with you about perl is a troll, saying that what you know about python is not correct is me defending my religion etc etc), and then you whine about people being impolite. Pot, meet kettle. > This is one lesson I'm not going to forget. Another lesson would be to actually learn and use Lisp before claiming exponential gains. It's not impolite to say you are regurgitating blogosphere bullshit when you claim with utmost confidence "I am sorry to ruin your party but there are languages like lisp and haskell which results in exponential gains" when actually you haven't used either one of them.