3 ms·
Oh, thanks for clarifying! Edit: looking at the press release, the improvement over old Ada is ... marginal? And Ada-01 is/was a poor performing model, tbh. I
by moralestapia 3y ago
Oh, thanks for clarifying!
Edit: looking at the press release, the improvement over old Ada is ... marginal? And Ada-01 is/was a poor performing model, tbh. I guess I'll have to run some tests, but at first sight it doesn't seem that wow-ey.
- LASR 3y agoSo just to be super clear, this is an embedding model. It generates no text. It’s not outputting words. Maybe I am assuming incorrectly, but I think the poor performance you are referring to is the old Ada completion model, where the output is text. That was poor indeed.
- itake 3y agoThis article is not kind to the old ada embeddings model: https://medium.com/@nils_reimers/openai-gpt-3-text-embeddings-really-a-new-state-of-the-art-in-dense-text-embeddings-6571fe3ec9d9 https://medium.com/@nils_reimers/openai-gpt-3-text-embedding... If the new ada model only has marginal improvements, it seems open source is way to go.