5 ms·
it was the outer skin catching fire This claim is always trotted out, but is false. The kerosene fuel produced the visible flames, while the hydrogen burned mo
by angiosperm 3y ago
it was the outer skin catching fire
This claim is always trotted out, but is false. The kerosene fuel produced the visible flames, while the hydrogen burned mostly invisibly. The skin mostly survived. Another common and false claim was that a bomb started it. No, it was the leaking hydrogen that ignited.
This doesn't mean a modern, unmanned airship shouldn't use hydrogen for lift. Adequate ventilation prevents ignition of leaks, and modern sensors can detect leaks. Harvesting humidity to replenish losses, using solar panels all over the top of it, is a reasonable design choice.
- mkl 3y ago>> it was the outer skin catching fire > This claim is always trotted out, but is false. [...] The skin mostly survived. Really? You can see the skin burning away in the photos and film: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_disaster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_disaster
- angiosperm 3y agoYes, but it ignited last, not first.