6 ms·
I'm starting to think you have an IE axe to grind. But anyway: It's not about me insiting on using IE. It's about a web site that excludes almost one third of
by Spearchucker 15y ago
I'm starting to think you have an IE axe to grind. But anyway:
It's not about me insiting on using IE. It's about a web site that excludes almost one third of the Internet population (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers).
Re-read what I wrote in the previous post. Also note my point that being free will not make me use a product. Chrome is spyware. Firefox offers nothing I need and don't already have. Safari means I have to switch hardware and software.
Oh, and IE9 mainstream support only ends in 2015 (http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselectindex http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifeselectindex). How's that an outdated browser? Unless your only measure of "current" is HTML5. In which case 99% of the Internet is outdated, no?
- melling 15y agoSafari runs on Windows, and you can use the Webkit version too: http://www.apple.com/safari/download/ http://www.apple.com/safari/download/ http://www.webkit.org/ http://www.webkit.org/ That one third of the Internet will have to wait for IE10 or upgrade to a better browser. My problem is that I think we've waited long enough to move forward with HTML5. Let's get on with it! There's no reason companies can't install Chrome along side of IE, for example. Slow moving companies will upgrade when they have to. It's starting to look like they have to.