4 ms·
Why does a website about a security vulnerability in a JavaScript engine sabotage the security mitigation of disabling JavaScript, by requiring it for collapsib
by pwdisswordfishc 3y ago
Why does a website about a security vulnerability in a JavaScript engine sabotage the security mitigation of disabling JavaScript, by requiring it for collapsible sections? As if they couldn't just use <details>.
- autoexec 3y agoNo joke! It's amazing how much better protected you are by not allowing javascript and other active content by default but websites are dead set against letting people do that without massive inconvenience because for some reason displaying even basic text and images has become unthinkable without requiring a bunch of third party remotely hosted JS
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]