3 ms·
This is hosted on GitHub Pages, so it takes very minimal resources to setup and keep running. The domain is also likely $10, assuming they didn't need to pay a
by judge2020 3y ago
This is hosted on GitHub Pages, so it takes very minimal resources to setup and keep running. The domain is also likely $10, assuming they didn't need to pay a squatter for it.
I think it's just a trend for any any huge-scale vulnerability research team to put together a website for it, as that amount of effort will indicate a certain level of attention the exploit requests of the reader / the security community at large.
And it doesn't always happen. Log4shell, for example, was not its own website: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29504755 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29504755
- wutwutwat 3y ago> as that amount of effort will indicate a certain level of attention the exploit requests of the reader / the security community at large. Feels like a dangerous way to gauge the severity of issues. What if the discloser doesn't have the funds or the skills to setup a dedicated website? Will it not get any attention since there's no yodawgiheardyoulike0days.com website to float up to the top of HN? This is what CVE severity scoring is for and what should be used, not the presence of a dedicated website, no?
- saagarjha 3y agoCVE scoring is about as worthless as whether a vulnerability has a website.
- wutwutwat 3y agoMaybe, but it's at least an agreed upon system and a centralized database and format, which can be improved since a org is behind it with the goal to make sec vul disclosure the best it can be. The wild west of marketing websites isn't advancing towards any sort of shared understanding.
- saagarjha 3y agoI am 100% on board with free and easy assignment of CVEs and a central database of them. I just don't think they are a good place for keeping vulnerability details, because it is too rigid. Having a link to relevant details is good enough, and if the link happens to just include everything in it then I'm fine with that.
- smoldesu 3y ago> What if the discloser doesn't have the funds or the skills to setup a dedicated website? Evidently they just get ignored, if their account of direct disclosure to Apple is anything to go off of.
- schiffern 3y ago"All crisis is profit." :) Clearly we need Vulnerability Website as-a-Service (VWaaS). . (joking or not? even i don't know! What I know is, there seems to be a fine line between cynicism and prophecy...)
- wutwutwat 3y agoYou joke but I bet it's already in the YC fall 23 batch