3 ms·

Not enough for what we need. Even if we covered all the possible area we could with trees we couldn't capture enough CO₂. And that ignores the fact that climat

Not enough for what we need. Even if we covered all the possible area we could with trees we couldn't capture enough CO₂. And that ignores the fact that climate change increases the chances of wildfires.

ruiisnwn 3y ago
Whom decided we need to reach this rediculous Net Zero target? Why not aim for minus 101 percent why we are at it
- kisamoto 3y ago
  Minus is the long term goal. Net zero is purely a stepping stone on the journey there.