3 ms·
> Finally, as someone working in AI, I’m actually very optimistic about their next approach of just learning an end to end model to drive the car. I think this
by ra7 3y ago
> Finally, as someone working in AI, I’m actually very optimistic about their next approach of just learning an end to end model to drive the car. I think this is the only scaleable way to reach human level driving. Any set of rules based + optimization based planner will have those edge cases that ruin the cars capability, in fact it turns out the long tail is really long.
Tesla doesn’t have an end-to-end model. They call it “end-to-end AI”, which just means they’re applying AI to all subsystems, exactly like everyone else. All the big players already use heavy ML-based planning systems that are not “rules or optimization based” and which are way more sophisticated than anything Tesla has put out or is planning to.
- sashank_1509 3y agoTheir latest model takes video input and outputs car trajectory, and that will supposedly replace their entire current optimization based stack
- ra7 3y agoWe don't know if that's actually true. Tesla claims "end-to-end AI" in their next iteration, not an "end-to-end model". Wayve [1] is the only one who has an end-to-end model that takes video input and outputs a trajectory, but they are still doing one-off demos. [1] https://wayve.ai https://wayve.ai