3 ms·
The right logic is the other way around. Why should the public compensate the land owner for something that also benefits the land owner? By your logic, restau
by tsimionescu 3y ago
The right logic is the other way around. Why should the public compensate the land owner for something that also benefits the land owner?
By your logic, restaurant owners should also be compensated for not being allowed to serve spoiled food, and bosses should be compensated for not beating their employees.
- nomel 3y agoIf someone buys a piece of land, how does it benefit them if that land is then made unusable? If it's for public benefit, and restrictions for public benefit, then it should be owned by the public. Taking what cost a mans life savings doesn't seem the right way to go to make that happen.