4 ms·
Well technically they do, but honestly the number of companies that need to worry about redundant DNS is probably .001%. It does matter for the some people, but
by shanemhansen 3y ago
Well technically they do, but honestly the number of companies that need to worry about redundant DNS is probably .001%. It does matter for the some people, but as someone from SRE once said "100% availability is the wrong target for basically everything".
dig SOA news.ycombinator.com
; <<>> DiG 9.18.16-1-Debian <<>> SOA news.ycombinator.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10818
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 512
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;news.ycombinator.com. IN SOA
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
ycombinator.com. 900 IN SOA ns-225.awsdns-28.com. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400
;; Query time: 39 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Wed Oct 25 10:52