4 ms·
> Artists are still able to produce art with or without photoshop And that's was some actual AI artists do too. Its massively turbocharging stuff thats they ca
by brucethemoose2 3y ago
> Artists are still able to produce art with or without photoshop
And that's was some actual AI artists do too. Its massively turbocharging stuff thats they can do in an illustrator or photo editor, but just takes forever. The tooling around diffusion is a deep rabbit hole, and requires some skill to use.
There's an important distinction between that kind of artist and the "AI users" flooding the internet. They are more akin to dank meme makers using Photoshop.
- numpad0 3y agoNot sure if that's happening at scale. AI-photobashing were and are attempted, but it seems AI always tries to undo changes so to bring deviations down to optically correct median form(as AI understands it), including all artist intentions. This applies to overall composition of the art as well. Being forced into an "average" grade sounds okay, but rather, I think, what is happening is that a new baseline for minimum meaningful art was created, and at the same time, new definition for value of art is being established as errors from that baseline. And I'm not sure those are good things.