4 ms·
There was an attempt at poisoning training data with such invisible cloaking before and it turned out that this didn't really affect training quality (Glaze was
by schleck8 3y ago
There was an attempt at poisoning training data with such invisible cloaking before and it turned out that this didn't really affect training quality (Glaze was the project name)
Iirc there was also some license violation with the cloaking code ironically, it was like a pillow fight
- schleck8 3y agohttps://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/11sqkh9/glaze_is_violating_gpl/ https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/11sqkh9/gl... Apparently this is the same team and they claim that the previous one was only intended to prevent training on an artist's style.
- brucethemoose2 3y agoThe ML community is stuffed with license violations. I have seen more than once instance of randomly copy-pasted code by sheer coincidence, recognizing it from older projects. ML researcher culture is hard to describe... But its something like "Everything is a research prototype, so why does it matter?"
- rhaps0dy 3y ago> There was an attempt at poisoning training data with such invisible cloaking before and it turned out that this didn't really affect training quality Source? The authors claim this is not the case, and they have experiments showing it.