3 ms·
This is indeed a fair point, and part of why I'm not really into it. In theory, you'd save a bunch of time and then use that extra time to add more polish to t
by danielvaughn 3y ago
This is indeed a fair point, and part of why I'm not really into it.
In theory, you'd save a bunch of time and then use that extra time to add more polish to the product. But in practice, what you'd actually be doing is reading someone else's (or something else's) code, and people who want to rely on AI are not the same people who have the stomach to do that.
So they're either going to (a) abandon the generated code and write their own, in which case, what was the point to begin with? Or (b) they're going to just say "fuck it" and push the generated code to prod.
Neither of those are good outcomes.
- gedy 3y agoI mean this is no different than life now. You have some MVP code patched up by startup hacker or "CTO", etc, then as team grows it's hard to work with.