4 ms·
I think the question would be better framed as “would I, someone who doesn’t do dumb things while driving, be safer in a driverless car?” Despite the universal
by graeme 3y ago
I think the question would be better framed as “would I, someone who doesn’t do dumb things while driving, be safer in a driverless car?”
Despite the universality of what you cite, driving accidents are likely an 80:20 issue where a small fraction of people cause most of the harm.
- brabel 3y ago"Would I" is the wrong question entirely. Almost everyone thinks they're better than average, which is statistically impossible, of course. No one caring about public safety will ever ask "would i", but "would the average person" because while they cannot avoid one specific accident, they're not trying to, they're trying to reduce the average: hence only average matters. To be completely honest, that's not completely true either, but it's the starting point... other things they must definitely consider is "would this AI cause fatal accidents by doing extremely dumb things, even if very rarely?" - because imagine that deaths are reduced by 90% when most vehicles are self-driving... but that every accident that happens is due to some extremely dumb bug, like "every 2 million parkings, the car will just reverse too fast without checking for obstacles and runover a child". That kind of thing would make for very bad PR and people are very sensitive to that kind of thing - even though that's not the most rational behaviour (as countless other children would've been saved in the grand scheme of things).