3 ms·
Six perfect cuts and two 53-47 splits (#6 and #8). For some shapes I was pretty analytical; for example #2 has 21 small squares, so I tried to first cover 11 sq
by lifthrasiir 3y ago
Six perfect cuts and two 53-47 splits (#6 and #8). For some shapes I was pretty analytical; for example #2 has 21 small squares, so I tried to first cover 11 squares then move it upward by a fifth of the unit. This approach apparently didn't work well for irregular shapes.