4 ms·
One problem is that the state taught them that it’s ok to lie, or at least that it’s ok to omit the full details. During the certification process for these se
by phatskat 3y ago
One problem is that the state taught them that it’s ok to lie, or at least that it’s ok to omit the full details.
During the certification process for these self-driving cars, incidents of the cars “misbehaving” (for lack of a better term) were supposed to be reported. However, if a human driver intervened, then it didn’t count as the car itself making a poor choice.
Example: self-driving car approaches an intersection clipping a reasonable speed and the light turns yellow. While a human driver would understand that it’s better to go through than to slam their brakes, the self-driving cat goes “yellow means red soon, stop now”. The human driver overrides and floors it through the intersection. Had the car stopped, that would’ve been a mark against the autonomous system. But since a human intervened, it doesn’t “count”.
This is a good watch on the state of self-driving cars and how policy makers have largely just said “eh, fuck it” in places like SF. https://youtu.be/pmGOjHi-7MM https://youtu.be/pmGOjHi-7MM