2 ms·
the commonality refutes nothing about my point let me merge it with your words: voluntary gambles exclude people that value their time, and waste the time of e
by yieldcrv 3y ago
the commonality refutes nothing about my point
let me merge it with your words: voluntary gambles exclude people that value their time, and waste the time of every party except the person chosen to be the winner
- HPsquared 3y agoSuch is life.
- yieldcrv 3y agoThere is a lot of active work on incentive models right now
- karaterobot 3y agoSo your point was just to make two value-free observations about challenges? I interpreted your comment as implying they were exploitative and unfair. Thanks for clarifying that you aren't saying that. I would make a small correction to your last message: challenges are not gambling in any sense of the word.
- yieldcrv 3y ago> I would make a small correction to your last message: challenges are not gambling in any sense of the word okay, reworded since you are allergic to that one word: negative expected value games of chance exclude people that value their time who may be a lot more skilled given the validation of their time. this is a large population and there exists other incentive model for even better results. hopefully people sit down and consider competing incentive models that work for this specific market.