3 ms·
There needs to be a line drawn from those who service a large number of people, and those who don't. Either way, only those who are big enough can be actively m
by spookie 3y ago
There needs to be a line drawn from those who service a large number of people, and those who don't.
Either way, only those who are big enough can be actively monitored and accounted for.
Before the obvious argument "where do you draw the line?", I may add that only a select and obvious number of social platforms reach the level of Meta's.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- username332211 3y agoThe original post claimed every post should be monitored for "harm to children". And that if giant social media companies can't do that, they shouldn't exist. Now you want to exempt everyone apart from giant social media companies from that same rule? This is getting a bit Kafkaesque.
- spookie 3y agoOh, I'm sorry. I didn't notice that extremely important part. That is... more than kafkaesque. I thought the conversation was around marketing, not user posts.