3 ms·
I think this point is needlessly pedantic because it hasn’t much to do with the topic at hand. GP’s point was that you were wrong to say that warrants are _only
by l33t7332273 3y ago
I think this point is needlessly pedantic because it hasn’t much to do with the topic at hand. GP’s point was that you were wrong to say that warrants are _only_ required for police searches.
The search we’re talking about here is very much the kind of search that warrants a warrant.
- legitster 3y agoAt least in the state of Washington, only police officers are authorized to execute warrants. So I don't feel like I am being pedantic. If you are saying it requires a warrant, it's officially a police search. I feel like I am taking crazy pills in this thread and no one has an idea of what a warrant actually is and they are just throwing it around like a magic word.