3 ms·
To be clear and dispel your misconception: These cars estimate rather than ‘know’.
by ballooney 3y ago
To be clear and dispel your misconception:
These cars estimate rather than ‘know’.
- ethbr1 3y agoThey objectively know in a much truer sense than any human. (Vehicle) Lidar/image multi-point calculation against a precision chronometer (Human) Parallax and object size change estimation against an extremely irregular, low-precision chronometer
- layla5alive 3y agoLOL. Tell race car drivers and truckers that they're inferior. Their senses are probably tuned just as finely as any vision system. You really discount non-quantitative measurements - as most tech people here do. You are wrong, though, that the best of the meat brains are so inferior.
- ethbr1 3y agoThe only thing wrong with non-quantitative measurements is that physics has a well-known quantitative bias.
- caf 3y agoReally they both estimate, but the vehicle tends to have smaller error bars on its estimates. Which still goes to your point.
- tialaramex 3y agoHumans are terrible at high velocity estimates. That's one of the conditions described in the accident investigation report for that Irish plane which smashed a bunch of runway lighting due to insufficient take off power. A brand new top of the line passenger jet would say e.g. "Caution: Acceleration" because it can work out the velocity of the plane, from there the acceleration and the remaining runway length (it uses GPS to identify the runway it's on) and take off speed and conclude we won't make it. Humans only decide that after it's far too late. Because it's much earlier the annunciation allows pilots to abort takeoff and investigate from the safety of the ground - in the Irish case they'd typed the wrong air temperature in and thus the engine performance was much worse than expected, with the right air temp it would have flown just fine
- mensetmanusman 3y agoWith a limited understanding of truth and know, yes.
- wlonkly 3y agoIn the same way a highway cop's lidar gun estimates.