5 ms·
> This post is just a rant. NestJS doesn't work for you? Don't f*** use it, no reason to hate. No reason to swear either. The article has an emotional title.
by starbugs 3y ago
> This post is just a rant. NestJS doesn't work for you? Don't f*** use it, no reason to hate.
No reason to swear either.
The article has an emotional title. The title explicitly says that it's a rant. It's literally about the author's emotion towards NestJS.
I don't get the point of your comment. You don't like the article? Don't read it!
- DrammBA 3y ago> No reason to swear either. This is the internet, it's okay to swear.
- rzzzt 3y agoIs there an RFC out for this one?
- zoover2020 3y agoMUST swear
- dylan604 3y agoit's been in the working group since the 90s, around the time <blink> was introduced. it just can't seem to be ratified into the official spec.
- ljm 3y agoThere was a whole post to comprehend that you dismissed because you didn’t like the naughty word.
- pcthrowaway 3y ago> You don't like the article? Don't read it! Some of us prefer to make a decision on whether or not we like an article after reading it
- starbugs 3y ago> Some of us prefer to make a decision on whether or not we like an article after reading it And some like to decide that they hate a certain framework after they have been using it. So what?