4 ms·
I don't believe it. If it was true it would have been reported elsewhere.
by lwhi 3y ago
I don't believe it.
If it was true it would have been reported elsewhere.
- dagmx 3y agoIt’s part of their keynote https://www.youtube.com/live/h_vh7_n_OPs?si=IShsKlKCKpBUlD6e https://www.youtube.com/live/h_vh7_n_OPs?si=IShsKlKCKpBUlD6e Though there’s some sleight of hand in that they appear to do that while allowing two of their cores to boost really high, count the ST perf of the boosted cores while claiming efficiency on the whole SoC. So it’s true and not at the same time.
- olyjohn 3y agoJust like every CPU benchmark. You just do certain tests and only reveal the ones where your chip is faster, and you put caveats on everything. This is how every new chip has been since the dawn of time. No single chip is faster at everything than it's competition... That's why you have to look at extensive, detailed benchmarks and see which ones are closest to your workload and pick what's right for you.
- littlestymaar 3y agoMust be true then: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/10/qualcomm-snapdragon-x-elite-looks-like-the-windows-worlds-answer-to-apple-silicon/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/10/qualcomm-snapdragon-...
- lwhi 3y agoThere we go ..