3 ms·

Let's just agree to disagree. I grew up with Windows, learnt programming on it, was C++ proficient, COM, COM+, switched to C#, .NET, WinForms, WPF ... and that

Let's just agree to disagree. I grew up with Windows, learnt programming on it, was C++ proficient, COM, COM+, switched to C#, .NET, WinForms, WPF ... and that was when it got too much. If you know Windows, you probably can at least feel why. I earned quite a lot of money with Windows. I had tons of apps on Windows, and all alternatives on Linux are better to me (IntelliJ vs. Visual Studio, VS Code the same, CodeLion). I had a MacOS stint in the middle of the transition, so maybe that's a difference. But still: I'm not you, you are not me, and that's okay. I'm just proof that it is probably subjective, and not objective, what you describe. And regarding the desktop OS experience: couldn't disagree more. But, as already said, probably taste :)

lstamour 3y ago
If Adobe or Serif announced Linux support, I’d switch in a heartbeat. I was about to add DaVinci Resolve to that list, but they actually released official Linux support, so I can cross some video editing off my list. And one presumes all web-based tools such as Figma also work well on Linux these days, so… the list of tools that aren’t Linux compatible might be vanishingly small now. But not zero, sadly.
- firebaze 3y ago
  Figma works perfectly on Linux¹. If you don't believe me, let's privately talk. E-Mail me at glitch@qygge.com, if you like. ¹ our (sub-orga-wide) UX crew uses MacOS, almost all Devs use Linux, and both of them use Figma
- init2null 3y ago
  Too many dev commenters will hand-wave away complaints about graphics work on Linux. Bitmap and vector graphics are terrible, and I have tried the options. RAW photo editing is mediocre. Font rendering and color management has always been behind. When I switched to a Mac, it wasn't that MacOS got vastly better. It was that Windows has been getting dramatically worse. I that being said, Resolve and Blender on Linux can nicely serve subsets of the creative community. We just need more.
runjake 3y ago
My hope is to find a viable enough setup to return to Linux, preferably on a modular component, unified memory ARM64 architecture of some sort, but I'm flexible.

lstamour 3y ago

If Adobe or Serif announced Linux support, I’d switch in a heartbeat. I was about to add DaVinci Resolve to that list, but they actually released official Linux support, so I can cross some video editing off my list. And one presumes all web-based tools such as Figma also work well on Linux these days, so… the list of tools that aren’t Linux compatible might be vanishingly small now. But not zero, sadly.

firebaze 3y ago
Figma works perfectly on Linux¹. If you don't believe me, let's privately talk. E-Mail me at glitch@qygge.com, if you like. ¹ our (sub-orga-wide) UX crew uses MacOS, almost all Devs use Linux, and both of them use Figma
init2null 3y ago
Too many dev commenters will hand-wave away complaints about graphics work on Linux. Bitmap and vector graphics are terrible, and I have tried the options. RAW photo editing is mediocre. Font rendering and color management has always been behind. When I switched to a Mac, it wasn't that MacOS got vastly better. It was that Windows has been getting dramatically worse. I that being said, Resolve and Blender on Linux can nicely serve subsets of the creative community. We just need more.

runjake 3y ago

My hope is to find a viable enough setup to return to Linux, preferably on a modular component, unified memory ARM64 architecture of some sort, but I'm flexible.