4 ms·
Seccomp BPF is great. There was some recent issues due to IO_uring and extensible syscalls, but I believe for now, those issues are avoidable. I believe the ne
by sargun 3y ago
Seccomp BPF is great. There was some recent issues due to IO_uring and extensible syscalls, but I believe for now, those issues are avoidable.
I believe the next generation looks something like landlock (https://docs.kernel.org/userspace-api/landlock.html https://docs.kernel.org/userspace-api/landlock.html).
- johnkoepi 3y ago+1
- johnkoepi 3y agoI love ideas behind Landlock but I don't fully see the struggle currently without taking into considerations issues with io_uring api. Seccomp nowadays with AppArmor|SElinux is enough even for Nested rootless containers. Nested even into std runc things. Both AppArmor and Seccomp profiles are stackable. If you don't need to generate unique profiles per each container you should be fine...