3 ms·
There is no objective morality, so any such ethics committee must have to make some trade-offs that are a matter of opinion. We can already mostly agree as a so
by shawnz 3y ago
There is no objective morality, so any such ethics committee must have to make some trade-offs that are a matter of opinion. We can already mostly agree as a society that protecting civil liberties is more important than having zero crime: otherwise we wouldn't have freedom of speech, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, and other things which make it easier to commit crimes.
- geraldwhen 3y agoMost of the world doesn’t have freedom of speech. You can absolutely be arrested and jailed for speech in Europe.
- gmerc 3y agoHave a chat with Alex Jones about the limits of free speech. Every country has for practical reasons of survival some limit on speech.