14 ms·
Taxis are not quick or efficient enough to make the cost worth it to many people. >door-to-door Doesn't have to be door to door. I use Uber all the time when
by robswc 3y ago
Taxis are not quick or efficient enough to make the cost worth it to many people.
>door-to-door
Doesn't have to be door to door.
I use Uber all the time when on vacation to get to places of interest and then back to the hotel. Trying to incorporate public transit would have added 30-40 minutes of walking, no idea how much additional time waiting. Saving ourselves an hour or so per day of vacation makes it worth it for us.
- anigbrowl 3y agoAs I said, 'most of the time'. If you're on vacation or time > money for wahtever reason, of course it makes sense.
- robswc 3y agoTime is money. Look at how much time WFH has saved people, no that they don't have to commute. If anything, I would say the ability to summon an AV and have it arrive in ~5 minutes would be more beneficial when you're _not_ on vacation. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellenhuet/2014/09/08/uber-lyft-cars-arrive-faster-than-taxis/?sh=3c9c3aacf2cb https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellenhuet/2014/09/08/uber-lyft-... Dated but it says 66% of riders can find a ride within 5 minutes. I think 5 minutes is a good target. With how subsidized public transit is, I don't believe these AV taxis could beat it on price... but they don't have to. They just have to make it low enough that the benefits of private travel outweigh the cons of public transit. People tend to take less public transit when they become wealthier, not more.