And at the time it was stolen, image reproduction techniques capable of displaying artwork in at least recognisable fidelity within mass-market publications wer

And at the time it was stolen, image reproduction techniques capable of displaying artwork in at least recognisable fidelity within mass-market publications were just being introduced. (The distribution of such images probably also reduced the effective value of the work-as-stolen as it would be more readily recognised if displayed publicly.) Attention returned repeatedly to the Mona Lisa through numerous subsequent events, e.g., Duchamp's reproduction with a beard and mustache added, in 1919. <https://www.britannica.com/story/why-is-the-mona-lisa-so-famous https://www.britannica.com/story/why-is-the-mona-lisa-so-fam...> <https://www.wikiart.org/en/marcel-duchamp/l-h-o-o-q-mona-lisa-with-moustache-1919 https://www.wikiart.org/en/marcel-duchamp/l-h-o-o-q-mona-lis...> Google's Ngram viewer suggests a further increase of references in print following 1980, though that might reflect a disproportionate presence of academic works within the scanned corpus: <https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Mona+Lisa&year_start=1819&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3 https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Mona+Lisa&year...>