4 ms·
Disclaimer: I acknowledge that this is a whataboutism argument. Why not use the phone to detect physical and verbal abuse? The microphone is always on for most
by gosub100 3y ago
Disclaimer: I acknowledge that this is a whataboutism argument.
Why not use the phone to detect physical and verbal abuse? The microphone is always on for most users, we have algos that can detect the sound of an adult yelling, a child crying, and the percussive sound of a human hitting another human. If 2/3 of those sounds are detected, why not forward that to NCMEC for further review? It doesn't have to be "1 yell, 1 cry, break down the door", it could be a pattern detector that logs the times, the severity, and the mode. If it hears objects being thrown, people yelling, kids crying, why isn't that sufficient to call authorities? How come "think of the children" suddenly doesn't work anymore?
I'm being 50% facetious here because obviously that's a huge privacy issue. But the same logic for CSAM scanning still applies nonetheless. Why only address 1/3 of abuse and ignore verbal/emotional, and physical? Those kids need justice too.
- rad_gruchalski 3y ago> Why not use the phone to detect physical and verbal abuse? And adultery! Require married couples to register their handsets in the national register and detect when people have sex! And if the phones are too far apart, send morality police with a whip. Ffs.
- eep_social 3y agoActually it would be easier and more effective to register every handset and run a check any time two are close together but otherwise isolated. That way we get adultery but as an added bonus, also any extramarital sex, gay sex, kinky sex, or just generally any behavior between two people that we don’t approve of. /s
- gosub100 3y agoSo punching a child is just a lifestyle choice, like getting laid on the side?
- rad_gruchalski 3y agoI don’t know, is it?