6 ms·
While I don't disagree, this is also a city that has whole lanes on major streets reserved for cable cars. The city isn't exactly known for making decisions tha
by edge17 3y ago
While I don't disagree, this is also a city that has whole lanes on major streets reserved for cable cars. The city isn't exactly known for making decisions that drive efficiency.
- earthling8118 3y agoCan you gather some information that backs up your claims here? How would devoting an extra lane to cars increase efficiency? I can't see a scenario where this would do anything but the opposite effect.
- edge17 3y agoSimple math? Assuming a fixed number of cars on the road, more lanes will increase the flow. The cable cars are novelty transportation for tourists that residents of the city don't actually use for commuting. In case it's not clear, I'm refering to California st starting downtown and going all the way up the hill.
- hot_gril 3y agoYeah but the cable cars only run in a limited area, basically the scenic hill you mentioned.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- edge17 3y agoNot sure the point here. California St is a major artery in and out of downtown. All I'm saying is there is an opportunity for improving the quality of traffic but instead the public resource of an entire lane is wasted on a bespoke piece of transportation history that runs at a loss in excess of $40m/year
- SAI_Peregrinus 3y agoIncreasing flow often increases the number of cars on the road, particularly with dynamic routing apps, so the first assumption is invalid.
- edge17 3y agoNo problem, so what is your argument for utilizing a whole lane for a mode of transportation that consumes a significant public resource without providing much benefit?
- athrun 3y ago100% agreed. Car lanes in the city consume a significant public resource (space) and encourage negative externalities (noise, heat, air pollution, etc.). They should absolutely be replaced with more space efficient options: tram tracks & bike lanes.