3 ms·
Violating sanctions is a big deal and a risk no business wants to explore. It’s unfortunate but true that most of the automated solutions have a very high false
by carterschonwald 3y ago
Violating sanctions is a big deal and a risk no business wants to explore. It’s unfortunate but true that most of the automated solutions have a very high false positive rate (sanctions are way more expensive than unhappy customers). When I was at jpmorgan I was told there was literally an entire campus in Florida for double checking every flagged transaction.
Tl;dr it’s expensive to run any sort of zero false negative, low false positive screening process without a lot of dedicated engineering and manpower, and if you’re not a bank you’re gonna do a scheme that’s got a greater false positive rate to keep the costs manageable
- sschueller 3y agoThe sanctions are against Hamas and Hesbola not the Palestinians.
- xboxnolifes 3y agoThank god nobody has ever lied about who they are online. Just ban the people who self label as Hamas.
- thelock85 3y agoAgree with this analysis but it's no where near sufficient to comply with sanctions. Said companies would still need to institute solutions that interrogate the nature of active marketing campaigns to avoid running afoul. This just seems lazy and (perhaps unintentionally) cruel.