The California DMV tracks "disengagements" and publishes them annually at https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/autonomous-vehicles/disengagem

The California DMV tracks "disengagements" and publishes them annually at https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/autonomous-vehicles/disengagement-reports/ https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/vehicle-industry-services/auto... The California PUC now requires quarterly reports that are published at https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/regulatory-services/licensing/transportation-licensing-and-analysis-branch/autonomous-vehicle-programs/quarterly-reporting https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/regulatory-services/licensing/transp... San Francisco's city/county transportation agencies, police, and fire departments have requested that additional information be tracked about crashes involving autonomous vehicles. But my understanding is that CA DMV and CPUC have denied those requests. There are currently some academic researchers filling this void with their own recordkeeping and analysis. Each time academics circulate a pre-print for peer review, Cruise appears to issue a press release based on its own internal statistics and its CEO goes on the offensive. So, to a certain degree, it's unsteady and loose regular by CA DMV and CPUC that have led to the former needing to suspend Cruise's permit today (rather than a much more gradual and controlled process of granting industry more leeway to test without safety drivers on public right-of-way).