3 ms·
Don't know if anyone at Sentry will read this, but I think the idea of the Functional Source License is pretty interesting. But is it customizable? e.g. does t
by arcanemachiner 3y ago
Don't know if anyone at Sentry will read this, but I think the idea of the Functional Source License is pretty interesting.
But is it customizable? e.g. does the source has to be made available 1 year? How about 2? How about 1.5?
How about something like FSL-Y2-MIT for a 2-year limitation? You could still use FSL-MIT for the standard 1 year term.
Then you could maybe allow quarter- or half-integer values, e.g. FSL-Y1.5-MIT or FSL-Y0.25-MIT.
All of this easily represented in the name or with minimal digging.
Just wanted to throw in my share of the bike-shedding.
- whit537 3y agoCross-posted at https://github.com/getsentry/loose-confederation/issues/4#issuecomment-1777805138 https://github.com/getsentry/loose-confederation/issues/4#is.... ;-) One of our goals is to keep the parameters to an absolute minimum, to aid in adoption. The simpler we can keep it the more easily it will get picked up, is the thinking.